Technology forges a world where human connection is no longer inhibited by distance. Barriers are broken and replaced with virtual bridges that create unprecedented potential for an interconnected present and future. And no doubt the areas most affected by this technological nexus are ones dominated by human synergy. An area at the center of this change is the pharmaceutical industry, characterized by technological and medical advancement, but faithfully guided by the necessity to improve the human condition. Clinical trials are at the forefront of pharmaceutical progress and clinical monitoring plays a key role in collecting high-quality trial data. As technology allows risk-based monitoring to become more frequently implemented, changes to the traditional monitoring set-up will occur. This report explores the reverberations of RBM implementation on trial operations as experienced by site personnel.
Sponsors & CROs
- High-level perspectives regarding the clinical trial experience through the eyes of the site staff. These findings can be used to understand what drives trial staff as well as what trial-related difficulties they encounter that may be assuaged with implementation of new methodologies.
- How sites view the role of the CRA, their typical working relationship with CRAs, and the issues they encounter in their CRA interactions.
- How a risk-based approach to monitoring can affect daily operations at clinical sites.
- Site personnel’s baseline level of knowledge and reactions to RBM to help sponsors/CROs plan useful conversations with trial staff regarding RBM implementation.
- Best practices for RBM use as relayed by site staff, including best practices for communication and training. Advice to sites and sponsors/CROs that are implementing a risk-based approach to monitoring.
- Insights on Running Clinical Trials
- Perspectives on Monitoring
- Perspectives on Risk-Based Monitoring
- Risk-Based Monitoring in Practice
- Risk-Based Monitoring: Suggestions and Outlook
ISR understands that you’re looking for confidence in your market research. With ISR, you’ll consistently receive
- Focused Domain Expertise — We’ve operated in pharmaceuticals for over 15 years and because it’s our sole focus, our domain expertise brings value to the work that “generalist” researchers can’t deliver.
- Genuine Research Expertise — Our market research experience has developed over 20 years in many dynamic industries. We capture appropriate sample sizes, given the research objectives, and we use appropriately sophisticated statistics to uncover everything that’s real and to give you confidence in your decisions. Read our Six Questions to Ask About Your Market Research to learn more about why our industry expertise sets us apart.
- Transparency — If you’re like many, you’ve been disappointed more than once by research providers who fail to live up to their promises, providing you with their “professional judgment” in place of sound data; and suspect contacts instead of real decision-makers. We deliver the beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of people who matter – and we’ll prove it by showing you the titles of your respondents.
For additional questions about any of ISR’s reports or custom research services, please contact us at info@ISRreports.com.
Pricing & Ordering
Table of Contents
Insights on running clinical trials
Most rewarding aspects of running clinical trials
Providing treatment options for patients
Shaping the future of medicine
New drug approvals
Least rewarding aspects of running clinical trials
Unappealing protocol aspects
Pain points in running trials
Unfamiliar with protocol / changes protocol
High monitor turnover
Perspectives on monitoring
Role of the monitor
Valued team member
Working with monitors
Frequency of on-site visits
Preparing for on-site visits
Scheduling on-site visits
Communication between site and monitor – traditional monitoring
Effects of monitor turnover
Qualities of a great CRA
Perspectives on risk-based monitoring
Understanding of RBM
Understanding of centralized monitoring
Reactions to RBM in trial protocol
Monitor support questions
Data requirements concerns
Risk-based monitoring in practice
Pre-study awareness of RBM approach
Benefits of RBM
Increased focus on data entry timelines
Centralized monitoring efficiency
Drawbacks to RBM
Less data oversight
Weaker monitor relationships
Points of contention
Extra burden vs. time-saver
Reducing costs vs. raising costs
Frequency of on-site visits when using RBM
Sponsor vs. CRO preference
Technology use in RBM studies
Data entry and data checks
Use of multiple systems
EDC training and testing desired
Risk-based monitoring: suggestions and outlook
Best practices for using RBM
Develop and implement detailed communication plans
Provide sufficient training
Worst practices for using RBM
Suggestions for RBM implementation
Advice for sites
Advice for sponsors/CROs
If you worked at a sponsor/CRO…
Clinical research conduct
Clinical research sponsors
Clinical research recency
Clinical research trial types
Unaided familiarity with RBM
Unaided familiarity with remote or centralized monitoring
Site experience with RBM
Involvement with RBM trials
Site experience with remote or central monitoring
Involvement with remote or centralized monitoring trials
Number of RBM trials by phase
Number of RBM trials by therapeutic area